
Frame from "Oversight Hearing titled “The Profit Engine Driving Environmental Nonprofits.”" · Source
House Republicans examine $24.8M in federal attorney fees to environmental groups
A House Natural Resources subcommittee examined Wednesday how federal agencies paid environmental nonprofits $24.8 million in attorney fee awards between fiscal years 2019 and 2024. The payments affect Alaska by shaping how litigation over federal lands, endangered species protections, and resource development projects is funded nationwide.
Rep. Paul Gosar, the subcommittee chairman, said roughly 76 percent of Equal Access to Justice Act awards from the Department of the Interior and Forest Service went to environmental nonprofits instead of forest management or energy development projects. Endangered Species Act fee-shifting payments totaled more than $20.2 million over the same five years.
Alaska has seen environmental litigation affect mining permits, timber sales, and oil and gas leasing on federal lands. The Department of the Interior manages roughly 60 percent of Alaska's land mass. The Forest Service oversees the Tongass and Chugach national forests, which together cover nearly 22 million acres.
How fee-shifting laws work
The Equal Access to Justice Act allows courts to award attorney fees to prevailing parties in certain civil cases against the United States when the government's position is not substantially justified. Environmental statutes such as the Endangered Species Act and Clean Water Act contain separate fee-shifting provisions that allow courts to award costs of litigation, including reasonable attorney and expert witness fees, to prevailing parties.
Supporters, including many Democrats, say these provisions are essential tools for individuals, tribes and nonprofits to hold the federal government accountable on issues like environmental protection and public lands management.
Some nonprofit attorneys bill at rates far exceeding their actual salaries, witnesses told the subcommittee. Jonathan Wood, vice president of law and policy at the Property and Environment Research Center, cited a case where an attorney paid less than $62.50 per hour asserted a reimbursement rate of $515 per hour, representing a 700 percent profit margin for the employing nonprofit.
The Equal Access to Justice Act has statutory caps on hourly rates that can be adjusted for cost of living or special factors, such as limited availability of qualified attorneys, which can permit higher rates than the statutory baseline. Environmental fee awards under statutes like the Endangered Species Act are uncapped and use the lodestar method, which multiplies a hypothetical hourly rate by the number of hours worked.
Gosar said courts using the lodestar method allow nonprofit lawyers to set their own hourly rates, which are usually rubber-stamped because time spent by the Justice Department contesting fee awards is added to a nonprofit's ultimate windfall.
This article was drafted with AI assistance and reviewed by editors before publishing. Every claim can be verified against the original transcript. If you spot an error, let us know.
Watch key moments from the source meeting. Click to expand.
Related Coverage
House Finance weighs bill to standardize state payment timelines
Alaska News · 1mo ago · 13 views · 72% match
House panel hears bill to ease farmland leasing, lower costs for Alaska growers
Alaska News · 2w ago · 6 views · 72% match
House Resources Committee debates LNG equity stakes, rejects wildlife refuge amendments
Alaska News · 4w ago · 3 views · 72% match
Alaska House committee reviews $759K in agency requests to fix payment delays
Alaska News · 1mo ago · 2 views · 72% match
Alaska House panel hears bill to shield ratepayers from data center costs
Alaska News · 6d ago · 1 views · 71% match
Comments
Sign in to leave a comment.
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.