Anchorage Assembly continues public safety commission hearing to June 9 after criticism of advisory-only powers

The Anchorage Assembly continued a public hearing Tuesday on a proposed Public Safety Commission to June 9 after community members criticized the ordinance as lacking investigative authority and real oversight power.

The proposed commission would advise the Assembly and mayor on public safety matters, review APD policies and procedures, and receive community input on policing concerns. The ordinance creates a seven-member body appointed by the mayor and confirmed by the Assembly, with members serving three-year terms.

The controversy centers on the commission's lack of enforcement power. The ordinance grants no subpoena authority, no independent investigative capacity, and no ability to compel APD cooperation or recommend disciplinary actions against officers. Multiple testifiers called these limitations disqualifying.

Michael Patterson, an organizer with the Party for Socialism and Liberation, said the ordinance is not civilian oversight but rather a deal between politicians and the police.

Several speakers framed the proposal as a continuation or rebrand of the former Public Safety Advisory Commission, which was allowed to sunset in 2024. That commission also lacked investigative powers and operated in an advisory capacity.

Brawley moved to continue the hearing after the criticism became clear, signaling that sponsors recognized the need for substantive changes before advancing the ordinance. The public hearing will continue at the Assembly's June 9 regular meeting.